Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ashlyn Krueger vs Sophie Chang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Chang analysis and find out who is favored!
Ashlyn Krueger vs Sophie Chang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Krueger 1 - 0 Chang
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 43.7% of points on their second serve, while Chang has won 41.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 57.2% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chang has won 58.01%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.97% and 41.59% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 57.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chang has saved 51.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 57.38% of matches played (W/L 35/ 26), with Chang winning 48.98% (W/L 24/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Chang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 123/ 101), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 60% of matches (W/L 15/ 10), where as Chang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.06% of matches (W/L 24/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Krueger winning 1 times and Chang being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Krueger winning 2 and Chang winning 0. The last match between Krueger and Chang was at the W80 Rancho Santa Fe, 06-10-2022, Second, Hard with Ashlyn Krueger getting the victory 6-3 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:58:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Chang have played a deciding set 0 times, with Krueger winning 0 times and Chang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 1, and Chang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 152.05 while Chang has played against players with an average rank of 210.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chang has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 40.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chang has converted 50.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
66
Rank
65
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
415
Rank
217
High
27
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
57% (120-89)
Career Total W/L
50% (244-244)
48% (13-14)
YTD W/L
60% (18-12)
$431,120
Career Prize Money
$41,315
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ashlyn Krueger | Sophie Chang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:0 | 1:58:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (53/72) | 49% (40/81) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (38/53) | 60% (24/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 37% (7/19) | 49% (20/41) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (37/81) | 38% (27/72) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Sophie Chang
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
81)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ashlyn Krueger | Sophie Chang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (13/14) | 60% (18/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (34/32) | 58% (39/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (316/294) | 53% (342/304) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 65% (15/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 82 | 81 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 0.55 |
| DFs Total | 120 | 173 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:17 | 1:48:36 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 135.37 | 176.17 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1245/1927) | 58% (1257/2162) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (812/1245) | 64% (802/1257) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (298/682) | 41% (375/905) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (109/268) | 51% (142/280) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (936/2064) | 48% (991/2082) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 62% (18/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (13/27) | 61% (17/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 70% (7/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (4/12) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (17/12) | 94% (17/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (17/5) | 6% (17/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 15% (13/2) |
Ashlyn Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
63%
(
83 of
131)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
107)
0
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
6
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
46%
(
60 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
107)
120
Total Points Won
118
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yulia Putintseva
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
34 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Vera Zvonareva
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
49%
(
41 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
51 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Sofia Kenin
54%
(
67 of
124)
1st Serve %
57%
(
63 of
111)
7
Aces
0
14
Double Faults
12
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
33%
(
19 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
51%
(
63 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
58 of
111)
119
Total Points Won
116
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Martha Matoula
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Ekaterina Alexandrova
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
90%
(
19 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Nao Hibino
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Sophie Chang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Sara Daavettila
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
30%
(
8 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
49%
(
44 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(6) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kira Matushkina
Player
Sophie Chang
75%
(
71 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
45%
(
43 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
46 of
82)
98
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Sophie Chang
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Usue Maitane Arconada
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
4
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
37%
(
16 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
46%
(
49 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Kayla Cross
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Alexandra Bozovic
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Sophie Chang
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
7
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Lia Karatancheva
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kayla Day
Player
Sophie Chang
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Maria Mateas
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Krueger Vs Chang Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
